31%
Only 31 percent of the $380 billion in global economic losses from natural disasters were covered by insurance in 2023 — on par with the long-term average protection gap.
Source: Aon’s 2024 Climate and Catastrophe Insights report
As climate change increases the frequency and severity of natural disasters and extreme weather, there are significant economic and social impacts. Enhanced data and analytics, climate modeling and industry collaboration are some of the ways organizations are protecting their employees, closing the protection gap and accelerating solutions to achieve net zero.
Weather and climate underpin many of the top risks businesses face today. According to Aon’s 2023 Global Risk Management Survey, four of the top 10 global risks — business interruption, regulatory and legislative changes, supply chain and distribution failure, and damage to brand or reputation — are all impacted by weather.
Changing climate conditions are demanding organizations address evolving risks and prepare for the journey to net zero in some of the following ways:
Only 31 percent of the $380 billion in global economic losses from natural disasters were covered by insurance in 2023 — on par with the long-term average protection gap.
Source: Aon’s 2024 Climate and Catastrophe Insights report
Natural catastrophe and climate modeling are helping organizations understand and assess their most significant exposures. They also support efforts to mitigate the impact of climate risk through alternative risk transfer solutions, such as parametric insurance, which are available in areas where traditional risk transfer solutions may not be available.
Robust climate modeling must consider a company's unique footprint, down to the asset level, and have global coverage.
“We have truly global data sets around a number of chronic risks — things like freeze risk, extreme precipitation, extreme heat and drought — and can provide a view of how these hazards will evolve over time,” explains Liz Henderson, Global Head of Climate Risk Advisory. “It is not a catastrophe or a full loss model, but it does give you an initial view regarding potential changes in climate risk.”
Chronic perils are driven by slowly evolving changes in temperature and rainfall patterns such as heatwaves, drought and rising sea levels. The physical risk and impacts accumulate over a long period of time and are the result of sustained or frequent exposure to increased hazard.
Acute perils, on the other hand, are infrequent, short-acting events like severe convective storms, hurricanes and floods — perils traditionally analyzed and covered by the insurance industry. While these can often be more extreme, they are also less common, leading to the development of catastrophe models to provide a way of measuring and managing their impacts.
Risk from chronic perils in the future can be projected using standard climate modeling approaches, while changes in acute perils are more challenging to project.
Some modeling firms are combining both approaches by incorporating the impacts of climate into their catastrophe models. For example, Aon’s Impact Forecasting team takes this approach for their U.S. hurricane and Germany flood models to enable longer-term planning around risk management, underwriting and regulatory reporting.
Another challenge when it comes to changing weather is time horizons. Unless organizations have assets that are built to last for the next 50 years, it can be hard to convey the relevance of changes in future extreme weather events.
But we do know that where there are changes in chronic risk, there are going to be changes in acute risks as well. And our confidence in the relationship between chronic and acute perils is increasing, driven by collaborations with academia to advance the science and understand the impacts.
We can use these climate insights to help understand where mitigation may be necessary so increases in hazard do not lead to increases in risk. Models may project more severity in storms, for example. But existing and planned mitigation — either in the natural or built environment — can reduce the impacts. A robust understanding of vulnerability alongside hazard is necessary for a holistic view of risk.
The long-term unpredictability of weather and climate can also impact specific sectors, such as renewable energy and infrastructure. Renewable energy projects, like offshore wind farms, need specialist technology to respond to changing climate conditions. As Guido Benz, CEO of Aon’s Global Renewable Energy Practice, explains: “There is a category called hurricane class wind turbines, and they're being certified based on models, but we have not actually seen them withstand the tests. These are elements that come into play in the context of extreme weather in the future.” It is apparent that there is unpredictability in new risks alongside the science and rigor of models.
Insurance has an important role to play in closing the protection gap and encouraging more green technology and innovation — which will ultimately accelerate the journey to net zero. But as (re)insurance premiums rise and carriers limit coverage for regions deemed too high-risk, there will be an increased emphasis on public-private partnerships.
In a number of countries, local and national (re)insurance schemes are filling gaps in coverage in high-risk areas; but questions about their solvency and sustainability have been raised in certain quarters. The issue illustrates one of the challenges of public-private partnerships: the financial burden that can befall state and local governments and the urgency needed to address climate-exposed risks.
Weather and climate risk will likely increase premiums, encourage more public intervention and ultimately influence where people choose to live and where businesses build new projects. These dynamics will inevitably demand greater public-private partnership to address risk coverage, financing and intellectual property sharing to limit exposures and build climate resilience.
Case Study
Aon worked with the government of Puerto Rico in 2023 to create the country’s largest government-sponsored parametric transaction. The program helps Puerto Rico reduce its dependence on the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by providing cover against hurricanes and earthquakes. This is the first parametric transaction designed to lower FEMA’s Obtain & Maintain requirement.
By covering natural disasters that can occur onshore and offshore, the island country will benefit from quick access to funds to support recovery and reconstruction when a hurricane or earthquake surpasses a pre-defined threshold. It is an important step in closing the protection gap for the country.
Paul Schultz, CEO of Aon Securities, explains: “We proactively worked with the Government of Puerto Rico to identify capital solutions for closing the protection gap and collaborated with colleagues across the firm to deliver an innovative solution in a dynamic marketplace.”
The global regulatory landscape for climate risk is complex, particularly for multinational companies. Due to macroeconomic circumstances and looming mandatory disclosures, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and SEC Climate Disclosure ruling, companies are focused on compliance.
“This is a bit of a balancing act for companies in the U.S., where climate and ESG are political terms, but they have large stakeholders in other regions where enhanced reporting, transparency and action on climate is expected,” explains Laura Wanlass, Global ESG Advisory Leader.
Multinationals need to strike a balance between disclosure and the desire not to raise undue controversy — whether it be accusations of greenwashing or questions from anti-ESG activists who remain vocal in the U.S.
As part of the transition to a net-zero economy, investors recognize their role in moving the needle toward decarbonization. By providing capital to emerging technologies and greener operating models, they can support the transition process, while also accessing potentially attractive future returns.
Regulation | What it Requires | |
---|---|---|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Climate Disclosure Rule | The agency approved the rule on March 6, 2024, after two years of public comment and debate. The final rule is not as stringent as the proposal. It requires publicly traded companies listed in the U.S. to disclose material climate-related risks, climate governance and risk management, Scope 1 and 2 emissions if they are deemed material (with an exception for smaller companies) and material emission reduction targets. This rule is currently under appeal. | |
U.S. California state Climate bills – SB 253 & 261 | California’s governor signed both bills into law in October 2023. Companies that do business in the state must disclose their scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and climate-related financial risk information. | |
U.S. Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Rule | The proposed rule would require all federal suppliers with over $7.5 million in revenue to report Scope 1 and 2 emissions; suppliers with over $50 million will also be required to disclose Scope 3 emissions, climate-related financial risks and set emissions reduction targets. | |
European Union Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) | The EU’s CSRD aims to address shortcomings on transparency and disclosure of non-financial information. Regulation takes place in three stages beginning in January 2024. | |
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) | The TCFD began as voluntary recommendations for companies to make their climate disclosures consistent and comparable. The guidelines, however, have been adopted in many jurisdictions, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, Japan and South Africa. |
Weather and climate are playing an increasingly significant role in workforce strategy, with employers considering factors including:
One of the more pressing considerations is how weather can impact business continuity. Flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires can impact a company’s employees, which can then exacerbate impacts on underlying business operations. Mitigation efforts include calculating the number of employees at a given location when doing physical risk modeling and looking for creative risk mitigation strategies — for example, issuing employee resiliency bonds to help employees with costs associated with extreme weather events.
With more employees working in hybrid or remote settings, employers should ensure they have data on where employees are living and when they are commuting. This information can then be paired with physical risk modeling to provide a more complete picture of the true impact of a weather event on the workforce.
The year 2023 was the deadliest year for natural catastrophes since 2011. Multiple significant heatwaves around the globe resulted in at least 16,500 heat-related deaths.
Source: Aon’s 2024 Climate and Catastrophe Insights report
There are three opportunities businesses need to consider in order to adapt to and mitigate the impact of changing weather and climate.
Natural catastrophe and climate analytics can help companies shape decision making around the issue of weather and climate risk, enabling them to develop strategies to close the protection gap, support employers in understanding regulatory changes and unlock new sources of risk capital. Using tools to capitalize on bringing together (re)insurance and commercial risk data will be key. Doing so will help clients examine their property portfolios in detail to determine which risks should be retained or transferred, identify exposures driven by natural catastrophes and other perils and drive down the cost of risk by optimizing the value of insurance in their programs.
Parametric coverages, catastrophe bonds and international emissions trading are also useful solutions underpinned by climate analytics that are helping companies understand future weather impacts and their organization’s unique risk profile.
Ensuring a better understanding of climate projections linked to local hazard risk and biodiversity are some of the ways companies are looking to mitigate climate exposures. To approach mitigation efforts more holistically, organizations should consider how both a transition to net zero and changes in local biodiversity can impact their business and supply chains. Taking a data-driven approach to achieve this can help clients understand a broad spectrum of risks linked to climate and biodiversity including temperature, water, land, pressures on flora and fauna, indigenous populations, socioeconomic factors, hazards and future climate risks.
As chronic perils become more deadly — most notably extreme heatwaves — employers know they must respond proactively to protect employees’ health and safety. Heatwaves, in particular, are associated with a rise in mental health concerns. One 2022 study2 found that emergency room visits for mental illnesses were much higher during the hottest days of summer compared to the coolest days in the same season.
Organizations need to develop strategies to ensure employees and their families have access to health and benefit coverage that protects them from climate-related impacts and illnesses. Heat-related offerings range from financing for heating and cooling systems to the energy costs themselves.
Heatwave-related illnesses can also be acute, so the availability of immediate medical care is also critical. Organizations should establish a monitoring program for the early identification of signs of heat-related illness and, through data and analytics, identify vulnerable employees based on factors like pre-existing conditions and location. They can then take proactive measures to ensure their people are protected.
The impact of climate change will require a new approach to risk management; one that considers a broad range of exposures and potential outcomes. To tackle the issue and create a true net-zero economy, an estimated $150 trillion is needed over the next 30 years, and insurance has a significant role to play. The industry will help to create greater certainty around exposure management, unlock investment in green technologies through risk transfer solutions and help businesses build greater resilience in the face of rising weather and climate-related threats. While volatility and complexity will be a feature of climate risk in the coming years, data-led decision-making will be central to building a resilient business and workforce as climate losses and impacts deepen.
Aon's Capabilities:
Through advanced modeling, climate risk consulting helps organizations understand their exposure to climate risk and how to mitigate that risk. Climate risk is a highly interconnected financial risk that can cause business interruptions, material scarcity, supply chain issues, reputational damage, property damage, asset value volatility and more. Aon helps clients make informed decisions around climate risk reduction and embed climate considerations into their strategies.
Parametric insurance is complementary to traditional insurance solutions. It can be used in a variety of weather-related situations — extreme heat, windstorms, flooding and wildfires — where a risk must be mitigated but may not be covered via traditional markets.
Aon helps organizations manage their catastrophe exposures with a proven methodology to understand each unique business need. Combined with an unparalleled depth of expertise, Aon’s insights allow clients to manage near-term volatility, build resilience and make better decisions for the future.
In an increasingly risky world, insurers and reinsurers need more sophisticated tools to quantify and manage the risks facing their businesses. Aon’s catastrophe model developers, Impact Forecasting, enable firms to analyze the financial impacts of catastrophic events to develop effective reinsurance, underwriting and exposure management. Impact Forecasting partners with academic and industry organizations to incorporate the latest research into all of Aon’s catastrophe models, enabling firms to analyze the financial impacts of catastrophic events to develop effective reinsurance, underwriting and exposure management.
Insurers are at the heart of creating a more resilient world, but face many interconnected, emerging risks and growing competition. Now more than ever, insurers require holistic services and global insight to better understand and address their strategic, multi-faceted business needs across growth, capital, operational efficiency and talent.
Embedded in the insurance industry, Aon knows how to listen better and interpret clients’ needs. Our solutions for insurers help them to:
Drive performance and growth by encouraging resilience and giving them the capacity to embrace increasing current and future risks
1 Aon’s 2024 Climate and Catastrophe Insight report
2 Association Between Ambient Heat and Risk of Emergency Department Visits for Mental Health Among
US Adults, 2010 to 2019 | Psychiatry and Behavioral Health | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
General Disclaimer
This document is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this document, Aon does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the document or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this document. This document has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication and is subject to any qualifications made in the document.
Terms of Use
The contents herein may not be reproduced, reused, reprinted or redistributed without the expressed written consent of Aon, unless otherwise authorized by Aon. To use information contained herein, please write to our team.
Our Better Being podcast series, hosted by Aon Chief Wellbeing Officer Rachel Fellowes, explores wellbeing strategies and resilience. This season we cover human sustainability, kindness in the workplace, how to measure wellbeing, managing grief and more.
Expert Views on Today's Risk Capital and Human Capital Issues
Expert Views on Today's Risk Capital and Human Capital Issues
Expert Views on Today's Risk Capital and Human Capital Issues